  | 
     
      Dr. 
        Reinhold Mißelbeck is head of the photography department in the Ludwig 
        Museum in Cologne. The following text in its original version was written 
        as a statement to an application from Lips for a scholarship from the 
        Krupp-Stiftung. With the removal of the last paragraph, this text was 
        also used as the catalogue text for the exhibition “Transformations of 
        a Dual Nature” (Wandlungen einer Doppelnatur) in Cologne in 1986. During 
        this time the museum also purchased several works from Lips.
      
      Dr. Reinhold Mißelbeck
      Roger Lips’ Photographs 
     
      Roger Lips’ photographs captivate by their diverse approaches in dealing 
        with a problem. They unite a portrait series, a series of scenes from 
        daily life as well as a sequence of nearly abstract color compositions, 
        which at the first glance seem to be three different themes and methods. 
        But after further consideration, the viewer recognizes that there are 
        three different visual manifestations of one and the same approach to 
        a subject. 
       The portraits are changed in color, scratched on the negative and drawn over; 
        they no longer describe an individual, but rather types and characters. 
        They exchange the loss of individuality for the principle of déjà-vu, 
        the supposed recognition of a person, a facial expression that seems to 
        be familiar. Everyone has experienced this. Our opinion of other people 
        at the first meeting is strongly influenced by details of recognition 
        of physiognomical details, certain movements, of facial expressions and 
        behavior that are well-known to us from other people we know. 
      However the changes to the faces in Roger Lips’ pictures not only serve for 
        the de-individualization. They go beyond that to the basic portrayal and 
        the exaggeration of that which the artist recognized in the person as 
        characteristic and typical. 
 | 
 | 
     
        The photographs of groups of people in vaguely definable rooms are aimed 
        in the same direction as well. The concreteness of the situation is eliminated 
        through the unfocused aspect of the photo, through the overlaying and 
        alterations in color.  
      Out of an instant which the camera has captured, a situation with a human 
        touch becomes something absolute, which has permanence and validity. Different 
        than in the portraits, here it is the environment, the feeling in rooms 
        and in the company of others which define the persons. The last group 
        of the abstract photos seems in a special way not to belong to this theme. 
       
      One thinks at first of Heinz Hajek-Halke, Chargesheimer or Manfred Kage. 
        But the starting point for every one of these pictures is a portrait, 
        which – through various manipulations – has been given a new environment, 
        a new form. They are to be viewed as the antithesis of the previous groups, 
        in which the human face can only be suspected beneath the layer of the 
        individual re-working by the artist.  
       It is right here that it becomes clear that the context of the three groups 
        is necessary, in order to properly interpret the individual picture. Viewed 
        all on their own, one could tend all too easily to draw parallels to other 
        contemporary approaches. In the overview the three styles of representation 
        mutually explain and combine themselves into an entirety.  
 |